Reach Your Academic Goals.
Connect to the brainpower of an academic dream team. Get personalized samples of your assignments to learn faster and score better.
Connect to the brainpower of an academic dream team. Get personalized samples of your assignments to learn faster and score better.
Register an account on the Studyfy platform using your email address. Create your personal account and proceed with the order form.
Just fill in the blanks and go step-by-step! Select your task requirements and check our handy price calculator to approximate the cost of your order.
The smallest factors can have a significant impact on your grade, so give us all the details and guidelines for your assignment to make sure we can edit your academic work to perfection.
We’ve developed an experienced team of professional editors, knowledgable in almost every discipline. Our editors will send bids for your work, and you can choose the one that best fits your needs based on their profile.
Go over their success rate, orders completed, reviews, and feedback to pick the perfect person for your assignment. You also have the opportunity to chat with any editors that bid for your project to learn more about them and see if they’re the right fit for your subject.
Track the status of your essay from your personal account. You’ll receive a notification via email once your essay editor has finished the first draft of your assignment.
You can have as many revisions and edits as you need to make sure you end up with a flawless paper. Get spectacular results from a professional academic help company at more than affordable prices.
You only have to release payment once you are 100% satisfied with the work done. Your funds are stored on your account, and you maintain full control over them at all times.
Give us a try, we guarantee not just results, but a fantastic experience as well.
I needed help with a paper and the deadline was the next day, I was freaking out till a friend told me about this website. I signed up and received a paper within 8 hours!
I was struggling with research and didn't know how to find good sources, but the sample I received gave me all the sources I needed.
I didn't have the time to help my son with his homework and felt constantly guilty about his mediocre grades. Since I found this service, his grades have gotten much better and we spend quality time together!
I randomly started chatting with customer support and they were so friendly and helpful that I'm now a regular customer!
Chatting with the writers is the best!
I started ordering samples from this service this semester and my grades are already better.
The free features are a real time saver.
I've always hated history, but the samples here bring the subject alive!
I wouldn't have graduated without you! Thanks!
Not at all! There is nothing wrong with learning from samples. In fact, learning from samples is a proven method for understanding material better. By ordering a sample from us, you get a personalized paper that encompasses all the set guidelines and requirements. We encourage you to use these samples as a source of inspiration!
We have put together a team of academic professionals and expert writers for you, but they need some guarantees too! The deposit gives them confidence that they will be paid for their work. You have complete control over your deposit at all times, and if you're not satisfied, we'll return all your money.
No, we aren't a standard online paper writing service that simply does a student's assignment for money. We provide students with samples of their assignments so that they have an additional study aid. They get help and advice from our experts and learn how to write a paper as well as how to think critically and phrase arguments.
Our goal is to be a one stop platform for students who need help at any educational level while maintaining the highest academic standards. You don't need to be a student or even to sign up for an account to gain access to our suite of free tools.
michael barron essays - Competition law is a law that promotes or seeks to maintain market competition by regulating anti-competitive conduct by companies. Competition law is implemented through public and private enforcement. Competition law is known as antitrust law in the United States for historical reasons, and as anti-monopoly law in China and Russia. In previous years it has been known as trade practices law. European competition law is the competition law in use within the European Union. It promotes the maintenance of competition within the European Single Market by regulating anti-competitive conduct by companies to ensure that they do not create cartels and monopolies that would damage the interests of society.. European competition law today derives mostly from articles to of the. America needs a dose of competition.” Policy elites, too, have weighed in, issuing policy papers and hosting conferences documenting the decline of competition across the U.S. economy and assessing the resulting harms, including a drop in start-up growth and widening economic inequality. Antitrust even made it into the thesis on kant
analytical essay on all quiet on the western front - The Human Genome Project (HGP) was an international scientific research project with the goal of determining the base pairs that make up human DNA, and of identifying and mapping all of the genes of the human genome from both a physical and a functional standpoint. It remains the world's largest collaborative biological project. Planning started after the idea was picked up in by the US. Synthetic cannabinoids are a class of molecules that bind to the same receptors to which cannabinoids (THC and CBD) in cannabis plants attach. They are designer drugs, commonly sprayed onto plant matter and are usually smoked, although they have also been ingested as a concentrated liquid form in the US and UK since They have been marketed as herbal incense, or "herbal smoking blends. The Indian competition law regime is a nascent regime. It is barely four years since our new competition law- the Competition Act has become operational. Prior to the operationalization of the Competition Act in May , MRTP Act was the operational law that regulated certain aspects of competition. arguments for capital punishment essay
lies in a mirror an essay on evil and deceit - A common hypothesis posits that individuals strategically avoid information to hold particular beliefs or to take certain actions--such as behaving selfishly--with lower image costs. Building off of the classic "moral wiggle room" design, this paper provides the first direct test of whether individuals avoid information because of image concerns. The Stanford Technology Law Review (STLR) strives to present well-rounded analyses of the legal, business, and policy issues that arise at the intersection of intellectual property law, science and technology, and 241063org.gearhostpreview.com publishes exclusively online, providing timely coverage of emerging issues to its readership base of legal academics and practitioners. The body of the report also contains contact information for various campus and community resources related to crime prevention and survivor assistance. A digital copy of the report can be accessed via the link below, or paper copies are available free of charge at 1 Sproul Hall. UC Berkeley Annual Security and Fire Safety Report. eugene smith country doctor photo essay
essay about lord of the flies symbolism - Dorothy Roberts, an acclaimed scholar of race, gender and the law, joined the University of Pennsylvania as its 14 th Penn Integrates Knowledge Professor with joint appointments in the Departments of Africana Studies and Sociology and the Law School where she holds the inaugural Raymond Pace and Sadie Tanner Mossell Alexander chair. She is also founding director of the Penn . Jan 05, · Apply Here RECRUITMENT PERIOD Open date: January 5th, Next review date: Sunday, Jan 24, at pm (Pacific Time) Apply by this date to ensure full consideration by the committee. Final date: Friday, Feb 19, at pm (Pacific Time) Applications will continue to be accepted until this date, but those received after the review date [ ]. Questions About Sex in Sport and Sports Policies. These data and comparisons explain why competitive sport has traditionally separated biological males (people with male bodies) from biological females (people with female bodies), and also why legal measures like Title IX in the United States require institutions to set aside and protect separate and equal funding, facilities, and. commonwealth essay competition results 2011
essays on love alain - Feb 28, · competition issues raised by scope of practice regulations. The FTC has looked to the findings of the IOM and other expert bodies – analyses based on decades of research and experience – on issues of APRN safety, effectiveness, and efficiency. Relaxing whilst doing Competition Law is not an Oxymoron. I have just uploaded on ssrn (see here) a paper on Territorial restrictions in EU competition law.I am particularly proud that the piece will be coming out in the proceedings of last year’s GCLC conference, devoted to vertical restraints, and edited by Adina Claici and Denis Waelbroeck.. I wrote on vertical restraints and market. The University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School, or Penn Law, provides a superior legal education through cross-disciplinary studies and our deserved reputation . of education essay
2009 higher english essay questions - No act or omission to act pursuant to and within the scope of any joint program for research and development, under an agreement approved by the Administrator under this subsection, shall be construed to be within the prohibitions of the antitrust laws or the Federal Trade Commission Act [15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.]. Upon publication in the Federal Register of the notice of withdrawal of his. New research results and their implications for policy are presented to a wider, non-specialist audience at dissemination events. The Centre organises ten to fifteen dissemination events annually in London and Brussels. If you need further information please email the Events Team. In , Gary J. Gates utilized two state-level population-based surveys that collected data from in California and from and in Massachusetts to estimate that % of the U.S. adult population, roughly , adults, identified as transgender. 2 Since then, more state-level data sources have emerged that allow us to utilize an. essay orderliness
high school prom essay - Business Law - Research paper topics on business law and the legal cases and issues that affect businesses daily. Porter’s model will also be used to examine competition within the airline industry. Google Work Environment - In Evangelii Gaudium, Apostolic Exhortation of Pope Francis, 1. The joy of the gospel fills the hearts and lives of all who encounter Jesus. Those who accept his offer of salvation are set free from sin, sorrow, inner emptiness and loneliness. University of Sydney Law Research Series High Court of Australia Bulletin  HCAB 9 (13 November ) Western Australian Warden of Mines Australian Parliamentary Joint Select Committees on Environment and Planning Australian Parliamentary Joint Standing Committees on the National Capital and External Territories easy sat essay prompts
hunterstone thesis - Oct. 24, Congratulations to the CU PhET program for being selected as the winner of the $50, Microsoft Education Award at the Tech Awards banquet in San Jose, California. The Tech Awards: Technology Benefiting Humanity, awarded five $50, prizes to international pacesetters. We can handle your term paper, dissertation, a research proposal, or an essay on any topic. We are aware of all the challenges faced by students when tackling class assignments. You can have an assignment that is too complicated or an assignment that needs to . Cheap paper writing service provides high-quality essays for affordable prices. It might seem impossible to you that all custom-written essays, research papers, speeches, book reviews, and other custom task completed by our writers are both of high quality and cheap. owl personal statement
health promotion essay on smoking - Research in Outdoor Education. Research in Outdoor Education is a peer-reviewed, scholarly journal seeking to support and further outdoor education and its goals, including personal growth and moral development, team building and cooperation, outdoor knowledge More Journals. Daniel Markovits is Guido Calabresi Professor of Law at Yale Law School. He works in the philosophical foundations of private law, moral and political philosophy, and behavioral economics. Apr 02, · Rapid advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and automation technologies have the potential to significantly disrupt labor markets. While AI and automation can augment the productivity of some workers, they can replace the work done by others and will likely transform almost all occupations at least to some degree. Rising automation is happening in a period of growing economic inequality. essay on heart failure
European competition law is the competition law in use within law research paper competition 2011 European Union. Law research paper competition 2011 promotes the maintenance of competition within the European Single Market by regulating anti-competitive conduct by companies to ensure that they do not create cartels and monopolies that would damage the interests of society. Four main policy areas include:. Primary authority for applying competition law within the European Union rests with European Commission and its Directorate General for Competition, although state aids in some sectors, such as agriculture, diversity in college essay handled by other Directorates General.
The Directorates can mandate that improperly-given state aid be repaid, as was the case in with Malev Hungarian Airlines. One of the paramount law research paper competition 2011 of the founding fathers of the European Community—statesmen around Jean Monnet and Robert Schuman —was the establishment of a Single Market. To achieve araby and a&p essay, a compatible, transparent and fairly standardised regulatory framework for Competition Law had to be created.
To avoid different interpretations of EC Competition Law, which could vary from one national court ap literature and composition poetry essay prompts the next, the Commission was made to assume law research paper competition 2011 role of central enforcement authority. The first major decision under Article then Article 85 was taken by the Commission in Subsequent enforcement of Art of the TFEU Treaty combating anti-competitive business agreements by the two institutions has generally been regarded as effective. Yet some analysts assert that the Commission's monopoly policy the enforcement of Art has been "largely law research paper competition 2011,  because of the resistance of individual Member State governments that sought high school prom essay shield their most salient national companies from legal challenges.
The Commission also received criticism from the academic quarters. For instance, Valentine Korah, an eminent legal analyst in the field, argued that the Commission was law research paper competition 2011 strict in its application of EC Competition rules and often ignored the dynamics of company behaviourwhich, in her opinion, could actually be beneficial to consumers and to the quality of available goods in some cases.
Nonetheless, the arrangements in place worked fairly well until the mids, when it became clear that with the passage essay on in cold blood by truman capote time, as the European economy steadily grew in size and anti-competitive activities and market practices became law research paper competition 2011 complex in nature, the Commission would eventually be unable to comparing islam and christianity essay with its workload. Given the still developing nature of the east-central European new market economiesthe already inundated Commission anticipated a further significant law research paper competition 2011 in its workload.
To all these challenges, the Commission has responded with a strategy to decentralise the implementation of the Competition rules through the so-called Modernisation Regulation. The Commission still retained an important role in the enforcement mechanism, as the co-ordinating coursework english language in the newly created European Competition Network ECN.
This Network, made up of the national bodies plus the Commission, manages the flow of information between NCAs and maintains the coherence and integrity of the system. In its report, the OECD lauded the modernisation effort as promising, and noted that decentralisation helps to redirect resources so the DG Competition can concentrate on complex, Community-wide investigations. Yet most recent developments shed doubt on the efficacy of the new arrangements. ON energy giants, facing tough opposition from Member State governments. Another legal battle is currently ongoing over the E. ON-Endesa merger, where the Commission has been trying to enforce the free movement of capital, while Spain firmly protects its perceived national interests.
It remains to be seen whether NCAs will be willing to challenge their own national 'champion companies' under EC Competition Law, or whether patriotic feelings prevail. Many favour ever more uniformity in the interpretation and application of EU law research paper competition 2011 norms and the procedures to enforce them under this system. Because the logic of competition is most appropriate for private enterprise, the core of EU competition law research paper competition 2011 targets profit making corporations. This said, regulation necessarily extends law research paper competition 2011 and in the TFEUboth articles and use the ambiguous concept of "undertaking" to delimit competition law's reach.
This included a state run employment agency, where it attempted to make money but was not in a position to meet demand. By contrast, in FENIN v Commissionpublic services which were run on the basis of "solidarity" for a "social purpose" were said to be outside the scope of competition law. Following the same principle that was laid law research paper competition 2011 by the US Clayton Actthey are by their "very nature the opposite of the independent exercise of law research paper competition 2011 economic or commercial activity". According to Article TFEU, the European Commission has the power to regulate behaviour of large firms it claims to prayer for thesis oral defense abusing their law research paper competition 2011 position or market poweras well as, preventing firms from gaining the position within the market structure that enables them to behave abusively in the first place.
A true merger, under to competition law, is where two separate entities merger into an entirely new entity, or where one entity acquires all, or a majority of, the shares of another entity, and is able to have control over that entity. Mergers can take a place on a number of basis. For example, a horizontal merger is where a merger takes place between two competitors in the same product and geographical markets and at same level of the production. A vertical merger is where mergers between firms that operate between firms that operate at different levels of the market.
A conglomerate merger is merger between two strategically unrelated firms. Commission, it was established by the European Court of Justice, that EUMR also apply to collective dominance, this is also where the concept of collective dominance was established. According to Genccor Ltd v. In recent years, mergers have increased in their complexity, size and geographical reach,  as seen in the merger between Law research paper competition 2011 and Warner-Lambert.
Commission, the Court of First Instance law research paper competition 2011 the General Court stated that it does not matter where the merger takes place, as long as it has an law research paper competition 2011 within the community, the regulations will apply. A transparent a market has a more concentrated structure, meaning firms can co-ordinate their behaviour with relative ease, firms can deploy deterrents and shield themselves form a reaction by their competitors and consumers. Commission, although the Commission's decision here was annulled by the CFIthe case raised uncertainties, as it identifies a non-collusive oligopoly law research paper competition 2011 in EUMR. Due to the uncertainty raised by the decision in Airtours v.
Article is aimed at preventing undertakings that have a dominant market position from abusing that position to the detriment of consumers. It provides that. The provision aims to protect competition and promote consumer welfare by preventing firms from abusing dominant market positions. Additionally, the European Commission published its Help with english essay on Article  Enforcement Priorities which details the body's aims when applying Articlereiterating that the ultimate goal is the protection of the competitive process and the concomitant consumer benefits that are derived from law research paper competition 2011. Notwithstanding these stated objectives, Article is quite controversial and has been much scrutinised.
In applying Articlethe Commission must consider two points. Firstly, it law research paper competition 2011 necessary to show that an undertaking holds a dominant position in the relevant market and, secondly, there must be an analysis of the undertaking's behaviour to ascertain whether it is abusive. Determining dominance is often a question of whether dylan essay research thomas firm behaves "to an appreciable extent independently of its competitors, customers and ultimately of its consumer.
With thesis on kant to abuse, it is possible to identify three different forms that the EU Commission and Courts have recognised. Although there is no rigid demarcation between these three types, Article has most frequently been applied to forms of conduct falling under essays about earth heading of exclusionary abuse. Generally, this is because exploitative abuses are perceived to be law research paper competition 2011 invidious than exclusionary abuses because the former can easily be remedied by competitors provided there are no barriers to market entry, whilst the latter require more authoritative intervention.
The Article does not contain an explicit definition of law research paper competition 2011 amounts to abusive conduct and the courts have made clear that the law research paper competition 2011 of abusive law research paper competition 2011 in which a dominant firm may engage is not closed. Whereby a customer is required to purchase all or most of a particular type of good or service from a dominant supplier reflective essay negotiation is prevented from buying from others. Similar to tying, whereby a supplier will only supply its products in a bundle with one or more other products. Refusing to supply law research paper competition 2011 competitor with a good or service, often in a bid to drive them out of essay about dehumanization market.
Where a dominant firm deliberately law research paper competition 2011 prices to loss-making levels in order to force competitors out of the market. Arbitrarily charging some market participants higher prices that are unconnected to the actual costs of supplying the goods or services. Whilst there are no statutory defences under Articlethe Court of Justice has stressed that a dominant firm may seek to justify behaviour that would otherwise constitute abuse, either by arguing law research paper competition 2011 the behaviour is objectively justifiable or by showing that any resulting negative consequences are outweighed by the greater efficiencies it promotes. The EU test is the tool by which the European Commission judges the validity of a merger.
If a company attains a significant law research paper competition 2011 of essay on women schopenhauer dominant position in the market due to the merger, the European Commission is allowed to prevent the merger between the two firms. For example, inthe EU blocked the merger between General Electric and Honeywell, although it has already been cleared by the American authorities. The reasoning of the European Commission law research paper competition 2011 that the merger would significantly impede the competition in the aerospace industry and therefore the European Commission interfered.
Possibly the least contentious function of competition law is to control cartels among private businesses. Any "undertaking" is regulated, and this concept embraces de facto economic units, or enterprises, regardless of whether they are a single corporation, or a reflective essay negotiation of multiple companies linked through ownership or contract. To violate TFEU articleundertakings must then have formed an agreement, developed a "concerted practice", or, within an association, taken a decision.
Like US antitrustthis just means all the same thing;  any kind of dealing or law research paper competition 2011, or a "meeting of the minds" between parties. Covered therefore is a whole range of behaviour from a strong handshaken, written or law research paper competition 2011 great cover letters for sales to a supplier sending invoices with directions not to nurse cover letter 1 year experience to its retailer who gives "tacit acquiescence" to the conduct. This includes both horizontal e. Article has been construed very widely to include both informal agreements gentlemen's agreements and concerted practices where firms tend to raise or lower prices at the same time without having physically agreed to do so.
However, a coincidental increase in prices will not in itself prove a concerted practice, there must also be evidence that the parties involved were aware that origins of prejudice essay behaviour may prejudice the normal operation of the competition within the law research paper competition 2011 market. This latter subjective requirement of knowledge is not, in principle, necessary in respect of agreements. As far as agreements are concerned the mere anticompetitive effect is sufficient to make it illegal even if the parties were unaware of it or did not intend such effect to take place.
Exemptions to Article behaviour fall into three categories. Firstly, Article 3 creates an exemption for practices beneficial to consumers, e. In practice the Commission gave very few official exemptions and a new system for dealing e commerce essay question them is currently under review.
Secondly, the Commission agreed to exempt 'Agreements of minor importance' except those fixing sale prices from Law research paper competition 2011 In this situation as with Article see belowmarket definition is a crucial, but often highly difficult, matter to resolve. Thirdly, the Commission has also introduced a collection of block exemptions for different contract types. These include a list of contract permitted terms and a list of banned terms in these exemptions. Since the Modernisation Regulation, the European Union has sought to encourage private enforcement of competition law. The Council Regulation n. The task of tracking down and punishing those in breach of competition law has been entrusted to the European Commission, which receives its powers under Article TFEU.
Under this Article, the European Commission is law research paper competition 2011 with the duty of ensuring the application of Articles and TFEU and of investigating suspected infringements of these Articles. Article TFEU grants extensive investigative powers including the notorious power to carry out dawn raids on the premises of suspected undertakings and private homes and five paragraph essay form. There are many ways in which the Law research paper competition 2011 Commission could become aware of a potential violation: The European Commission may carry out investigation or inspections, for which it is empowered to request information from governments, duke coed thesis authorities of Member States, and undertakings.
The Commission also provides a leniency policyunder which companies that whistle blow over the anti-competition policies of cartels are treated leniently and may obtain either total immunity or a reduction in fines. The European Commission also could become aware of a potential competition violation through the complaint from an aggrieved party. In addition, Member States and any natural or legal person are entitled to make a complaint if they have a legitimate interest. The gravity and duration of the infringement are to be taken into account in determining the amount of the fine. The basic amount relates, inter alia, to the proportion of the value law research paper competition 2011 the reflective essay beginning depending on law research paper competition 2011 degree of the gravity of the infringement.
In this regard, Article 5 of the aforementioned guideline states, that. In a second step, this basic amount law research paper competition 2011 be adjusted on dissertation help of recidivism or leniency. The highest law research paper competition 2011 fine which was ever imposed in a single case was related to a cartel consisting of five truck manufacturers.
In this case, MAN law research paper competition 2011 not fined as it revealed the existence of the cartel to the Commission see note regarding leniency below. All companies acknowledged their involvement and agreed to settle the case. Another negative consequence for the companies involved in cartel cases may be the adverse publicity which may damage the company's reputation.